ripper22
11/16/14 07:49AM
I want to know why this was deleted
nfsfw.com/gallery/d/10404-3/123294898.jpg

Uploaded that a few days ago and now it's gone. I see nothing wrong with it, i tagged it appropriately but it was removed. I want a reason for that

edit: so apparently the first link is broken, try this one:
gyazo.com/47c0ebe3f88c64dbe1fb139a13918a37.png
ydfc85
11/16/14 09:08AM
When I click on the link, I get a blank white page.
Theclarinetist
11/16/14 09:26AM
ydfc85 said:
When I click on the link, I get a blank white page.
same here.
ripper22
11/16/14 10:27AM
slayerduck
11/16/14 05:11PM
looks underage to me, do not want.
ripper22
11/16/14 09:08PM
slayerduck said:
looks underage to me, do not want.

It's not dude….
Theclarinetist
11/17/14 09:00AM
I dunno my trust is rattled...
alaron
11/17/14 07:11PM
ripper22 said:
slayerduck said:
looks underage to me, do not want.

It's not dude….
No way for anyone to confirm that, thus, it was deleted.
ripper22
11/18/14 12:40AM
alaron said:
ripper22 said:
slayerduck said:
looks underage to me, do not want.

It's not dude….
No way for anyone to confirm that, thus, it was deleted.

You take a look, use your better judgement, and make the deduction for yourself. There is also no way to confirm whether or not they ARE underage so why not keep it?
ydfc85
11/18/14 02:46AM
ripper22 said:
alaron said:
ripper22 said:
slayerduck said:
looks underage to me, do not want.

It's not dude….
No way for anyone to confirm that, thus, it was deleted.

You take a look, use your better judgement, and make the deduction for yourself. There is also no way to confirm whether or not they ARE underage so why not keep it?


Let me start by saying I like the pic, as to your question however:

1. Personal logic and reasoning often become irrelevant when it comes to unlawful activity. "That leads to self censorship!" one might yell, and yep it sure does.

2. This site has advertisers. Perception of wrongdoing is often more important than determining the fact of it. "That leads to self censorship!" one might yell, and yep it sure does.

3. The maxim for this instance, since the question is about illicit material, is "better safe than sorry" not "act now, apologize later". "That leads to self censorship!" one might yell, and yep it sure does.

As an addendum, here is a hilarious example: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lupe_Fuentes#Court_appearance.
ripper22
11/23/14 12:16AM
Meanwhile things like this get uploaded:

xbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=549775
1


Reply | Forum Index