localhost said:
Anything differing from "straight" (A+B = male plus female) is gay (n+n = anything plus anything). Sure, you can make up categories in-between, but that would be just cosmetic, no?
Anyone disliking gayness is gay, well, because, nature is gay. (animals swapping gender, men have nipples, too, et al.)
Now, boys and girls, let's all grow up and GROUPFAP!
*faps*
Everything you wrote, lack for the word I'm thinking of, contradicts itself. Biologically, sexuality only follows one path; these "in-between"s are little but stray branches.
If something was not chosen does not mean it was inborn. Some desires are acquired or strengthened by habituation and conditioning instead of by conscious choice. For example, in the ocean you have a mature squid ready to procreate, but it is unable to find a mate; much less find any other of its kind at all. After weeks of fruitless searching, it comes across another male squid, and through a straining instinctual call, dominates it. Now the squid was not born gay, nor would continue homosexual behaviors if a female came around. Is nature gay? No. Is gayness observed sometimes in nature? Definitely.
As for gender swapping: organisms only do so for reproductive reasons; if a populous area contains too many of any one sex. And not because of a misplaced sense of comfortability, as it is found in humans
Men have nipples? Duh. In all humans before sex is determined, the generic genetic code for sex is built into the fetus. This shouldn't be a reasoning ground that nature is gay.
I am unsure of the point you were trying to make. I can tell you my point was to contradict what you wrote. Lol